Monthly Archives: February 2011

What’s Memorable

Writing about how we choose brings to mind other research about decision-making. Not only do we take the choice that’s framed positively: we avoid risks except when it comes to our own sense of vulnerability. Advertisements

Posted in authenticity, framing, health, risk, science, science communication | Leave a comment

Good News, Bad News

The science writer for the Oregonian, Joe Rojas-Burke, wrote a story yesterday about framing and health, the focus of my research and writing.

Posted in authenticity, framing, health, journalism, news bias, risk, science, science communication, writing | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

What Hat Would You Be?

If you were a hat, what hat would you be?

Posted in authenticity, framing, Indian, Native Science, repatriation, science, science communication | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Self-fulfilling Prophecies

We admonish students to take great care when they’re doing research to avoid self-fulfilling prophecies.

Posted in science | Leave a comment

Almost Random

A colleague told me yesterday that students know little about scientific methods when they enroll in her sophomore class. It’s not that they’re dumb: they lack a certain literacy about science. And they have little idea of what methods mean.

Posted in risk, science, science communication | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Just Throw the Ball

Writer Adam Gopnik wrote a lovely thought about how a message is like a baseball: “The trouble with mental catch is that the ball you throw changes in mid-air into another.”

Posted in authenticity, framing, risk, science | Tagged | 1 Comment

Smells Like Teen Spirit

Smells are important: primal, even. Anyone’s who has smelled an infant’s scalp knows this. My daughters smell like roses and ice cream.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment