When Buildings are Alive

St. Benedict

When Eirik Thorsgard talked about sacred sites to a college audience this week, he asks how we define sacred.

Is sacredness different for Indians? Catholics? Jews?

Thorsgard, who works as the historic preservation officer for Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde, told the crowd about one sacred site that crosses cultural divides.

Take, for example, an abbey in the Willamette Valley settled by Benedictine monks in 1882 at Mt.Angel.

Local tribes long held the grounds as sacred, and Thorsgard marveled that—regardless of cultural background—denizen and settler alike found the mountain top a rich site for prayer.

Rather than arguing that the Catholic settler usurped native holdings, Thorsgard figures Indian ways-of-knowing permeate the Abbey.

I like to think Catholics pray in the same spot as my relatives, he says.

Cultural intersections move both ways: the colonial hegemony doubtless holds sway over the native, but indigenous epistemologies filter through, too.

But where does sacredness begin? Where does it end?

Thorsgard believes some buildings are sentient: a longhouse, for example. “Buildings are living entities,” he says.

But think about a sacred building that has meaning to you. Is it still sacred if you…take down one wall? Two walls? Three walls?

He asks a final question: how many walls can we take down until a building is no longer sacred?

[Day three of Native American Heritage Month. I pledge one blog per day in honor of my Osage and Oglala ancestors.]

Unknown's avatar

About Cynthia (Istá Thó Thó) Coleman Emery

Professor and researcher who studies science communication, particularly issues that impact American Indians. Dr. Coleman is an enrolled citizen of the Osage Nation.
This entry was posted in authenticity, Lakota, Native Science, Osage, science, science communication and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment