Why American Indians don’t have rights

Kumeyaay man

Kumeyaay man

The issue of “rights” in North America entered into conversation when I saw this week that—after 38 years—a judge ruled two ancient skeletons could be given to a California tribe for reburial.

Unlike Kennewick Man—which has yet to be returned—a judge decided the California remains should be restored under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act.

The NAGPRA act was signed into law in 1990 to protect Indian remains and artifacts that have long been subject to grave robbing, black market sales and scientific studies.

But scientists trumped the law by claiming they have a right to study Indian bones.

Problem is, whose rights are at stake?

Should scientists have the right to study your ancestor’s remains?

In the Kennewick Man case, anthropologists claimed they had a First Amendment right to study the skeleton.

But local tribes argued under federal law their ancestors are protected: they can’t be sold, studied, moved or mangled.

The Indians lost, and Kennewick Man has become the province of scientists.

Unlike the recent California case of the Kumeyaay people, tribal arguments lost out to the right to study the bones.

So it’s worth examining when some rights are more worthy than others.

Critics charge that racism pure-and-simple diminishes the rights of the down-trodden.

I argue Indians never had that same footing as settlers, citizens and scientists. Our rights have never been equal.

Scientists in the 1800s considered Indians (and all non-Europeans) subhuman. Their skulls and brains were empirically proven to be smaller than Caucasians’ and were therefore deficient.

Scientific views translated into political views, and Indians were believed incapable of being civilized.

So they lacked the same rights as settlers—they could not own property nor vote, and their communities were managed by government agents.

Beliefs in the lack of intellect continue today but in more nuanced form.

Stereotypes frame Indians as closer to nature. Indians are one-with-the-animals and more spiritual.

Such stereotypes reinforce the myth that Indians lack intelligence and rationality, giving way to the notion that scientists are in the best position to make judgments that impact Indians.

Kumeyaay man dressed for a traditional dance, copyright free photo from
http://www.nmai.si.edu/environment/kumeyaay/People.aspx

Advertisements

About Cynthia Coleman Emery

Professor and researcher at Portland State University who studies science communication, particularly issues that impact American Indians. She is enrolled with the Osage tribe.
This entry was posted in american indian, authenticity, framing, Indian, Indian remains, journalism, NAGPRA, Native Science, science, science communication, SKeleton, Uncategorized, writing and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Why American Indians don’t have rights

  1. A'lul'koy_805 says:

    Scientists believe they have the first amendment to study Native American ancestors? That’s ludicrous! Why should they have any rights to our ancestors? They think they have an inherent right to what ever it is they wish to study, and are entitled to everything, be it remains, or genetic material of living Native Americans. Whatever the consequences. I think we should not give them the satisfaction of testing our DNA, because in the end, we are the losers. Especially the not yet contacted tribes, they must be protected at all cost. It is so pathetic when you hears Scientists whining about how the Indians are harrassing them and putting them out of business. Pathetic!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s