Advertising’s Ubiquity

thrid try

The word of the day in our propaganda class is ubiquity.

Advertising, we learned, is ubiquitous.

Borrowed from the Latin, by way of the French, ubique refers to “everywhere.”

Students understand advertising completely, offering examples from the logos on football jerseys to the display ads in college cafeterias.

Some ads are slightly more subtle, such as the paper bag that contains the medicine packed by your local pharmacy, encouraging you to buy an over-the-counter antihistamine.

This week we learned our neighbor state of Washington approved advertisements in the state parks.

The decision is borne by a lack of funding.The Tacoma News Tribune reported that Washington’s parks once received 60-80 percent of funding from the state.

Today, the state parks receive only 10-20 percent of their funds from the state.

Once free, state parks now charge admission, as reporter Matt Driscoll notes.

Park personnel reassured Driscoll the ads would be tasteful.

Problem is, once you accept advertising dollars, an avalanche of unintended consequences ensue.

Take the example of North American schools that accept gifts from soft drink giants like Coca-Cola and Pepsi.

Some 80 percent of public schools now have contracts with soda behemoths, according to Mother Jones.

While schools once relied on public funds, vested interests now pay for “field trips, gym uniforms, SMART Boards and other frills that individual school budgets may not otherwise have afforded,” the magazine reports.

Deals with soda companies mean vending machines occupy schools, offering students high calorie drinks and fat-laden snacks.

The New York Times links childhood obesity with state laws that require nutrition information on snacks like the ones in vending machines.

The Times reports on a study of more than 6000 students, showing a significant correlation between childhood obesity and states with less restrictive food laws.

Another unintended consequence of allowing ads in a public space has resulted in conflicts over taste, race and gender.

New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) found itself embroiled in more than one controversy over ads, and ended up banning political ads.

The right-wing hate group whose moniker belies its true colors–the American Freedom Defense Initiative—promotes perfidy and falsely accuses Muslims of crimes.

The group bought ads on New York transit that promote the worst sort of deceit under the banner of free speech.

In one ad, Adolf Hitler is photo-shopped with a Muslim religious leader underneath the heading, “Islamic-Jew Hatred: It’s in the Quran.”

The MTA also came under fire for initially rejecting ads that feature underwear designed for women in the midst of menstruation.

The ads unabashedly state: “Underwear for women with periods.”

So: will state parks become embroiled in conflicts over advertising?

Because parks represent a public space, the issue over free speech is likely to take hold.

Imagine the following ads in your state park:

  • The Bushmaster rifle ad that promotes machismo
  • A condom ad for “the messy end”
  • Constipation solution ads

Can’t wait.

#advertising

#ethics

#propaganda

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

About Cynthia Coleman Emery

Professor and researcher at Portland State University who studies science communication, particularly issues that impact American Indians. She is enrolled with the Osage tribe.
This entry was posted in advertising, american indian, censorship, ethics, propaganda and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s