Time to Move the Pipeline

Today’s New York Times Editorial

10pipeline2-web-master675

New York Times photo of Phil Little Thunder Sr. Photo by Alyssa Schukar for The New York Times

A major shift in news coverage occurred this summer as citizens gathered in North Dakota to protest construction of a 1,134-mile oil pipeline.

And, for once, mainstream news media witnessed and reported on the events.

While non-Indian media have failed to attend to critical issues from an Indian perspective—favoring scientists over culture over the bones of Kennewick Man and cheering on businesses that dig copper, silver and gold mines on sacred lands—the proposed pipeline drew media in droves.

And today, November 4, 2106, during National Native American Heritage Month, the New York Times editorial board states:

It’s time to move the pipeline.

The decision about where to place the pipeline plays out like a case study in society’s prejudices.

The pipeline—which will run through four states in North America and deliver crude oil—was scheduled to be built near North Dakota’s capital, Bismarck.

The Times reports that the pipeline was rerouted because regulators saw a “potential threat to the city’s water supply.”

Instead the pipeline is now slated to run through Indian territory, close to Sioux land (less than a half-mile from one reservation) and “under the Missouri River,” which provides drinking water to residents.

And the Indians are standing up to government agencies and private business interests that made decisions favoring the denizens Bismarck over the indigenous people of North Dakota.

The Times editorial notes construction of the crude oil pipeline is one among a boatload of decisions impacting indigenous people, who “pay the price for white people who want to move environmental hazards out of sight, out of mind and out of their water faucets.”

Now is the time for a “meaningful discussion of the pipeline’s merits,” the editorial notes.

About time indeed.

4 November 2016

Photo credit: Phil Little Thunder Sr., from the Rosebud reservation in South Dakota, carries water from his hometown for the sacred ceremony to the burial ground in North Dakota. Alyssa Schukar for The New York Times

Celebrating National Native American Heritage Month

#pipeline

#Nativescience

# Nationalamericanheritagemonth

Advertisements

About Cynthia Coleman Emery

Professor and researcher at Portland State University who studies science communication, particularly issues that impact American Indians. She is enrolled with the Osage tribe.
This entry was posted in american indian, Dakota pipeline, native american, Native American Heritage Month, native press, new york times, risk, sioux, SKeleton, social justice, writing and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Time to Move the Pipeline

  1. Once Written says:

    The pipeline territory is also in dispute.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s