Magazine takes Redskins to task

The current New Yorker cover by Bruce McCall

The current New Yorker cover by Bruce McCall

The New Yorker magazine’s latest issue hit subscribers and newsstands this week with a cover that takes the Redskins football team to task.

Titled, First Thanksgiving, the cover—a painting by Bruce McCall—shows a trio of Native Americans arriving at a feast.

Some of their hosts are wearing Redskins t-shirts over the black-and-white vestments we’ve come to associate with pilgrims.

The table is adorned with turkey and trimmings while a banner hangs above the flat-screen TV with the words, “Go Redksins!” The team’s logomark decorates the rafters.

The painting is like a Rorschach image: people see in the picture what they want to see.

I showed my students the cover and asked what it meant to them. All agreed the painting criticized the team that has refused to change its name.

The First Nations people pictured look proud and dignified, one student said. Another chimed in that the football fans looked like drunken louts.

Not one student thought the fans were honoring American Indians.

I checked the internet for news stories about the cover to see whether folks had weighed in on the image.

The Washington Post, the Washington Times, the mainstream broadcast news stations, News from Indian Country and the Huffington Post all had stories or editorials. Only one considered the cover a bad idea.

Journalist Christopher Harper commented in the Washington Times that the cover is the most offensive he has seen in the New Yorker.

“Let us…concentrate on what Thanksgiving is really about. It is not a day of controversy about what immigrants did to the indigenous population. Thanksgiving is a day to thank God for all he has done for us.”

Writing in News from Indian Country, Simon Moya-Smith called the cover “profound.”

Moya-Smith says the truth about Thanksgiving has been both omitted and mythologized.

In 1676 settlers in the New World said Thanksgiving offers a time to rejoice in the subduing of their enemies. “The enemies [mean] Native Americans,” Moya-Smith writes.

He closes by noting that the term Redskin offends, rather than honors.

And the artist? McCall says team names like the Redskins and Braves came from another era.

“This is 2014, and it seems a little late to be dealing with that stuff,” McCall says. “It should have been quashed a long time ago. We did everything to the Indians that we could, and it’s still going on. It seems crude and callous.”

The interview with McCall appears on the magazine’s website in a story written by New Yorker staffers Mina Kaneko And Francoise Mouly.

McCall wanted to see the reaction to the cover: “I’ve brought the cultural arrogance of one side back to the sixteen-hundreds and the first Thanksgiving dinner.”

Blog #27 for Native American Heritage Month


About Cynthia Coleman Emery

Professor and researcher at Portland State University who studies science communication, particularly issues that impact American Indians. Dr. Coleman is an enrolled citizen of the Osage Nation.
This entry was posted in american indian, authenticity, Indian, journalism, science, writing and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Magazine takes Redskins to task

  1. Hi Cynthia, This morning at breakfast in a restaurant, we noticed a lovely young family. The dad, a clearly caring young man, was wearing a hoodie with a Native chief and the word, “think”, emblazoned on it. We asked him about the image. He responded that it had been borrowed from a Massachusetts high school athletic program. The hoodie was the product of a skateboard company’s effort to get high schoolers to think. We found ourselves speechless.


  2. Actually, the hoodie read, “Theory” which is the name of the company.


  3. My students get an ear full from me regarding the manufactured history shared via the propaganda machine. As a resident of Maryland, living less than 6 miles from FedEx Field, home of “that” football team, I hear this argument constantly. I personally believe the fans, including the owner, are experiencing high levels of cognitive dissonance. I believe these fans, including Mr. Snyder, have cognitions about the sensitivity of their logo as it relates to the Native Americans. With never-ending media coverage and continued public scrutiny, there has to be high levels of discomfort. Well, it didn’t take long for his public relations team to attempt to remove that dissonance…Mr. Snyder sat front in center with Navajo Nation president Ben Shelly at a football game back in October. I guess if the president of the Navajo Nation can sit with the owner of “that team,” anyone experiencing dissonance now have a newly created comfortable illusion that replaces the old one….there is balance and all is well with the fans…NOT.


    • The Jon Stewart show interviewed fans of the team and detractors (including members of the comedy troop the 1491s–natives, of course), showing the fans in a rather derisive frame. One of the fans is part Cherokee. While that may seem odd to some, Indians aren’t a homogenous group, despite the stereotypes. Perhaps another way to look at the Navajo leader sitting with the owner, is–well–the leader represents an N of 1.
      Thanks for pointing this out, thanks your reading, and thanks for thinking about this topic. Weh wee nah.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s