Have we lost our moorings?

censorFor weeks our local public radio station had urged us to consider what the American Dream means.

I discovered when I spent part of one summer talking with faculty and students in Amman, Jordan—as part of an exchange–the denizens we met clearly considered the United States a democracy.

They wanted to know how our free press works, and asked what it’s like to live in a democracy.

In Jordan, citizens are ruled by a dual system overseen by a king and a prime minister: a parliamentary monarchy.

Although Jordan hosts elections for some political seats, the prime minister is appointed by the king.

Their press is government-owned, although journalists have a relatively free hand in reporting news.

Their views on the United States are remarkable: most of the folks I spoke with regard North America as resolutely free.

Crime-ridden, but free.

What is a democracy?

Demos, from the Greek, means “the people,” and kratos refers to power.

Democracy, by definition, refers to rule by the people.

We extend “democracy” to the underpinnings of the American press.

A group of intellectuals—led by Robert Maynard Hutchins (the president of the University of Chicago)–discussed the role of the press in a democracy after World War II drew to a close.

The blue ribbon panel (called the Hutchins Commission) published a report in 1947 that “the press has a moral obligation to consider the overall needs of society when making journalistic decisions in order to produce the greatest good.”

The Commission noted that the mass media play a “pivotal” role in forging a democratic society: one in which citizens (and hence, voters) are informed by a press that communicates information that helps everyone make cogent decisions.

The best way for such information to flow is with a “free” press: one that exists without the censorship of governments and special interests.

One media scholar this week told NPR that the new censorship is the flood of information (or misinformation) that drowns our channels.

“Right now, there is too much information,” opined Zeynep Tufekci of the University of North Carolina.

“In the 21st century, censorship doesn’t work by withholding information. Censorship now works by flooding with information, by causing distraction, by causing confusion, by creating doubts and just this question mark and shadow so that you really can’t figure out what’s going on,” she added.

“And to me, this is almost like the opposite of whistleblowing. This is whistle-drowning in confusion and distraction.”

If Tufekci is correct—if we are flooded with stories that create doubt rather than certainty–and if we “can’t figure out what’s going on,” then the news media have failed us.

Journalistic decisions appear to capitalize on stories that titillate and shock. Why else would reporters share Twitter blasts from candidates?

While the press were once damned for running sensational stories that would “sell papers,” today’s media shoot for click-bait—stories that get “liked” and passed along to other readers, regardless of their merit.

And that means reporters are failing their obligation to make journalistic decisions in order to produce the greatest good.

We have lost our moorings.

Artwork from openclipart.org

#nativescience

#theamericandream

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

About Cynthia Coleman Emery

Professor and researcher at Portland State University who studies science communication, particularly issues that impact American Indians. She is enrolled with the Osage tribe.
This entry was posted in american indian, censorship, democracy, election, native press, politics, press, social media and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Have we lost our moorings?

  1. Cynthia, I agree: we do seem to have lost our moorings. How could there be three presidential debates and discussion of the North Dakota pipeline or climate change? How could there be no real conversation about poverty, illness, and displacement? I suspect strongly that our “leaders” also wish to distract us in drama rather than have real conversations about profound human concerns. Thank you for yet another thoughtful, deep post.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s