The dirt on relatives

Red Cloud

Red Cloud

My relatives fought with their Oglala brothers and ended up splitting into separate bands.

We tore away after Bull Bear argued with Old Smoke.

The story is that Bull Bear threw dirt in Smoke’s face, and they considered our band “cut off” or Kiyaska. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Crazy Horse: Tiyospaye

crazy horse stampLarry McMurtry—who wrote Lonesome Dove, The Last Picture Show and Terms of Endearment—penned a biography of Crazy Horse that proved a solid summer read.

McMurtry writes about my relatives in the book Crazy Horse (Penguin-Viking, 1999).

He says Crazy Horse was a lad of five or six when Francis Parkman camped with Old Smoke’s village in 1846. Parkman wrote about his adventures in The Oregon Trail.

Parkman and his troupe, guided by my great-great-great-great grandfather, a Frenchman married to a Lakota woman, witnessed Sioux-settler relations first-hand.

Following is one of Parkman’s observations of an Oglala warrior: Continue reading

Posted in american indian, authenticity, Francis Parkman, Henri Chatillion, science, science communication | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Being Tonto

Tonto

Tonto

Finally got up the nerve to see The Lone Ranger.

The movie earned jibes from Indian Country and was slammed by the critics all summer.

My Facebook pals panned the film so I figure I can’t critique it without viewing it. Continue reading

Posted in american indian, authenticity, cinema, film, framing, Indian | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Real Science. Really.

gaston_maspero_demaillotageThe mummy exhibit is billed as Real Science.

Calling the Mummies of the World display Real Science legitimizes the practice of stuffing dead people under glass and taking them on the road for show-and-tell.

Never occurred to me it would be fake science, but the billing allows advertisers to claim:

Real Mummies.
Real Science.
Real People.

Real Science means a team studied the human remains using modern techniques including computerized tomography (CT scans) and carbon dating without having to hack off bones for study. Continue reading

Posted in authenticity, framing, Indian, journalism, Native Science, science, science communication, writing | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Mummies: what’s sacred? Private?

imagesSeems museums have dodged flak for placing dead folks on display.

And the current iteration of mummy-memorabilia is no exception. Continue reading

Posted in framing, Native Science, science, science communication | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Groping for meaning in science

My colleagues and I have been groping with the idea of Native Science.

One reason is our earnest attempt to legitimize American Indian perspectives–whether it’s science, story-telling, art or language.

Continue reading

Posted in american indian, authenticity, Indian, native american, Native Science, science communication | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Belief+Doubt=Sanity

Artist Barbara Kruger plays with words.

Her installation at the Hirschhorn Museum in Washington DC invites you to think: it’s called Belief+Doubt.

Plastered on the museum walls and archways are bold words colored in red, white and black.

Turns of phrase beg you to pay attention:

Continue reading

Posted in authenticity, framing, journalism, Native Science, writing | Leave a comment

Dirt in my shoes

How did I start on this path?

Dirt in my shoes.

I’m speaking about my research at a meeting attended by communication and journalism researchers and teachers.

Each of us on the panel is describing what we can learn from indigenous knowledge and how we can use this knowledge.

As a writer who likes science, I ended up studying how science is communicated, particularly issues about health, risk and the environment.

And I look at how these issues affect indigenous peoples.

Just like the characters Susan Powers describes in her book, The Grass Dancer.

In the novel, a medicine woman with a trickster streak wants to keep a white school-teacher on the rez, so she secretly sprinkles Black Hills dirt in the girl’s shoes. And the teacher just can’t bring herself to leave.

I explain to the audience that I study how Indian knowledge systems embrace a more holistic view of life, where science isn’t separated from art, music, cooking, eating and hunting–at least, traditionally.

But that doesn’t mean native peoples are anti-science. Science is folded into everything.

Including the dirt in my shoes.

[Photo of the Black Hills from city-data.com]

20130809-101357.jpg

Posted in american indian, Indian, journalism, Lakota, native american, Native Science, science, science communication | 2 Comments

Science vs anti-science

Science as web

Science as web

During her video-talk on how to present your research, the speaker divided audiences into anti-science and science folks.

The talk was sponsored by a prestigious science academy so I expected more than a blunted view of lay audiences.

Maybe that’s because I have re-examined my own thinking about science.

When I study journalistic stories on scientific (and environmental, health and risk) conflicts in Indian Country, I find reporters often frame Indians as anti-science. Continue reading

Posted in framing, Indian, journalism, Native Science, science, science communication, writing | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Growing tobacco, staying connected

Home-grown  Nicotiana sylvestris

Home-grown
Nicotiana sylvestris

I cannot tell you why I decided to grow tobacco.

I cannot tell you because I don’t understand myself.

Early spring a photo of a white trumpet flower caught my eye while rifling through seed packets at the garden shop. Continue reading

Posted in american indian, Indian, Lakota, native american, Native Science, Osage | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment